Priest (Screen Gems)

Synopsis: Set in an alternate world, one ravaged by centuries of war between man and vampires, a legendary Warrior Priest (Paul Bettany) from the last Vampire War lives in obscurity among the other downtrodden human inhabitants in walled-in dystopian cities ruled by the Church. When his niece (Lily Collins) is abducted by a murderous pack of vampires, Priest breaks his sacred vows to venture out on an obsessive quest to find her before they turn her into one of them. He is joined on his crusade by his niece's boyfriend (Cam Gigandet), a trigger-fingered young wasteland sheriff, and a former Warrior Priestess (Maggie Q) who possesses otherworldly fighting skils. Written by Cory Goodman and Min-Woo Hyung, Priest also casts Christopher Plummer and Madchen Amick.

 My take: Ok, imagine the Templar Knights learned Krav Maga. Then imagine they have cool weapons and jet-powered motorcycles. Add to that  they live in an alternate universe that looks kinda like it came from the minds of the Mad Max creators. And their enemies? Let's have them battle the boss creature from the first Resident Evil, but, not just one, but a whole bunch of them, Oh, and let's make them vampires, too! Now THAT would be a cool movie, huh? Now let's give this film the personality of John Kerry, make the "vampires" as dangerous as a slightly irritated Shar Pei and, instead of Tina Turner in a metal brassier, the "Thunderdome" is a lame office building run by the Catholic Church. Way to fuck it up guys!

How many ways does this film suck? First of all, this film made me uncomfortable in a couple ways. I felt that the film denigrated Native Americans. Blood-thirsty, soul-less, savage beasts locked away on "reservations" just didn't sit well with me. Maybe I'm over reacting. I don't know, but it unnerved me. Then they have society ruled by the Church. The "Church" is quite obviously supposed to represent the Catholic Church. Their portrayal was of an uncaring organization more concerned with image and power than helping those less fortunate. Maybe it's because I was raised Catholic (I'm lapsed now), but I didn't like it.

Let's move on to the acting. The main character shows absolutely no emotion at any time in this film. Did someone just kidnap your niece? Did someone just try to rip your head off? Did someone just shit in your cornflakes? Don't ask me! I can't tell! Paul Bettany was totally flat throughout this entire crapfest. Hell, Keaneu Reeves displayed more emotion in Speed 2: Even Speedier! And he wasn't even in it! (Note: Yes, I know it was Speed 2: Cruise Control, but that movie sucked, too. "Ya know, we should capitalize on the success of Speed by making the same movie, but this time it'll be on a boat!" Great idea, fellas. I prefer my boats to include T-Pain and the guys from Lonely Island. Either that or make it a boat during a Playboy video shoot. Speaking of Playboy, when is Jennifer Aniston going to show the goods? I heard that we almost get a peek in her next film, but that's just a tease. Imagine what it would be like if porn was considered the more legitimate form of cinema. Hollywood would be a much happier place....)

See? That I would veer off topic like that shows just how shitty Priest is. I'm actually kinda pissed I wasted my time watching it. In fact, I'm done talking about it.

Verdict: Crap, crap, crap, crap, and spectacular crap. The film looks sleek and stylish, but that's just a glossy finish on a huge turd!

My rating: Avoid it like the clap!

Genre: Action, Adventure, Horror, Sci-fi, Fantasy
Rated: PG-13 for intense sequences of violence and action, disturbing images and brief strong language
Run Time: 1hr 27min

Thor (Marvel Studios/ Paramount)

Synopsis: The Mighty Thor (Chris Hemsworth), a powerful but arrogant warrior is about to succeed Odin (Sir Anthony Hopkins) as king of Asgard when an attack by the Frost Giants interrupts the ceremony. Against the wishes of his king, Thor, and his band of close warrior friends, go to the realm of the Frost Giants in search of answers. His arrogance and reckless actions reignite the ancient war. Thor is stripped of his powers, cast down to Earth and forced to live among humans as punishment. Once here, Thor learns what it takes to be a true hero when the most dangerous villain of his world sends the darkest forces of Asgard to invade Earth. Directed by Kenneth Branagh, Thor also stars Tom Hiddleston as Loki, Natalie Portman as Jane Foster and Clark Gregg reprises his Iron Man role of Agent Coulson of S.H.I.E.L.D.

My Take: I can't wait for The Avengers to come out! Seriously. The anticipation is making me expect too much from these superhero movies. Don't get me wrong, this movie was great, but I guess I expected more. It wasn't as good as Iron Man, but, at least it was better than Hulk (or The Incredible Hulk, take your pick.) 

The film starts with a mild scene introducing Natalie Portman's character, Jane, and her small team of scientists who just happen to be in the right place at the right time, when Thor is banished and sent to Earth through Heimdall’s Observatory, a space portal between the 9 realms. The movie then does a flashback that describes the history of the Asgardians as protectors of the 9 realms and their relation to Earthlings. This is where the movie explodes. Good thing they had Anthony Hopkins to do the voice-over. He's one of the few who could do justice to the Shakespearean levels to which they went. The grandiose Asgard and desolate, frozen Jodunheim look incredible, the battles are exciting and the acting is top shelf.

Helmsworth really steps out of his soap opera shoes and really carries the film. He plays the self-righteous douche-bag to a tee. Thor is basically Superman with a hammer and a gay Nordic fashion designer, so I guess he has a lot to be cocky about. He really fits the part well, when he battles the Romulan Blue Man Group with the powers of Iceman from X-Men... I mean, the Frost Giants. I didn't like how quickly he learned humility and humanity while on Earth. it would have been nice to see Helmsworth take his character through that transition, but I guess there was too much that needed to be crammed in, what with the falling in love with Jane, trying to reclaim his magical hammer Mjolnir from S.H.I.E.L.D. and an awkward cameo by Jeremy Renner as The Avenger’s Hawkeye.

Personally, Tom Hiddleston was underused. Yes, he does have a very prominent role as the mischievous Loki, though he spends half the film looking like a slightly more effeminate Lady Gaga. He plays the part like a seasoned veteran, but they don't delve into his emotions enough, and that's a lack in the script, not the actor. I did enjoy the interplay of sibling rivalry, as any younger brother can understand exactly as he felt.


Too bad the script wasn't put together better. 5 script writers can come up with some great scenes, but each scene is disjointed from the others without someone to pull it together. I think they forgot to hire that person. The script jumps back and forth between Asgard/Jodunheim and Earth a bit too much, but, overall, is effective and entertaining with plenty of comic relief thrown in.

Verdict: Like I said earlier, Thor is not as good as Iron Man, but it's still a must see, especially if you are unfamiliar with the story and want to be up to date and ready for The Avengers, due out next year. Thor is a pretty good start to the summer blockbuster season. Besides, when it comes to superhero movies, "if you build it, they will come". BRING ON CAPTAIN AMERICA!!!

My Rating: See it (You'll Buy it if you're a real Avengers fan)

Genre: Drama, Action, Adventure, Sci-fi, Fantasy
Rated: PG-13
Run Time: 2hr. 10min.

Rio (20th Century Fox/ Blue Sky)

Synopsis: From the makers of the hit ICE AGE series comes RIO, a comedy adventure about taking a walk on the wild side. Blu is a domesticated Macaw who never learned to fly, living a comfortable life with his owner and best friend Linda in the small town of...  Blu (voice of Jesse Eisenberg) is a domesticated Macaw who never learned to fly, living a comfortable life with his owner and best friend Linda (voice of Leslie Mann) in the small town of Moose Lake, Minnesota. Blu and Linda think he's the last of his kind, but when they learn about another Macaw, they head to the faraway and exotic land of Rio de Janeiro to find Jewel (voice of Anne Hathaway), Blu's female counterpart. Not long after they arrive, Blu and Jewel are kidnapped by a group of bungling animal smugglers. With the help of street smart Jewel, and a group of wise-cracking and smooth-talking city birds, Blu escapes. Now, with his new friends by his side, Blu will have to find the courage to learn to fly, thwart the kidnappers who are hot on their trail, and return to Linda, the best friend a bird ever had. From the makers of the Ice Age series, Rio, directed by Carlos Saldanha, also features the voice talents of George Lopez, Jamie Foxx, Tracy Morgan, Jemaine Clement and Will I Am.

My Take:  Did you like Ice Age and Robots? Then you'll most likely enjoy Rio. The story is pretty straightforward and predictable, but that's kind of what you expect from a cutesy family film. The story is nice and the characters are fun and engaging, but the real draw is the animation. With the vibrant colors and stunning scenery, this film really takes advantage of the big screen. Carnival looks amazing, and the 3D effect really highlights the depth and beauty of the fly-over scenes. This is truly Saldanha's homage to his homeland. 

The story is your basic fish-out-of-water and boy-meets-girl mix, with a bit of underlying social commentary about exotic animal trafficking. Even a homeless boy is a pivotal character. It moves along pretty well, slowing a bit in the middle, before ramping things up a bit at the end. Eisenberg (The Social Network, Zombieland) plays the neurotic Blu to a T, without overdoing it and becoming annoying, Hathaway (The Princess Diaries, Love and Other Drugs) does her usual bang-up job, and Clement (Flight of the Concords, Dinner for Schmucks) is excellent as the evil Nigel. The rest of the cast is your typical stereotype filler, but are enjoyable, none the less. 

The only real detraction is for the musical numbers. It's not that they"re intrusive, or inappropriate in any way, the issue is that they're boring and unforgettable.  "Under The Sea" and "A Whole New World" these are not. You won't be singing them at work on Monday.

Verdict: Rio cute, it's predictable and it looks great. Sounds like a kids movie to me! You'll like it and so will your kids. And, since there is a lack of DECENT family movies out right now, upgrade to 3D, if only for the breathtaking fly-over of Rio. (Childless adults can wait for the DVD... unless you're into watching kids movies alone... I won't judge.)


My Rating: See it


Genre:Animation, Family, Adventure, Comedy
Rated:G - for mild, off-color humor
Run time:  1hr 36min

Scream 4 (Dimension Films)

Synopsis: Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell), now the author of a self-help book, returns home to Woodsboro on the last stop of her book tour. There she reconnects with Sheriff Dewey (David Arquette) and Gale (Courteney Cox-Arquette), who are now married, as well as her cousin Jill (Emma Roberts) and her Aunt Kate (Mary McDonnell). Unfortunately Sidney's appearance also brings about the return of Ghostface, putting Sidney and the gang, along with the whole town of Woodsboro, in danger. Written by series creator Kevin Williamson and directed by Wes Craven, the film stars also include, Hayden Panettiere, Rory Culkin, Anthony Anderson, Adam Brody, Marley Shelton, Nico Tortorella, Kristen Bell, Anna Paquin and Lucy Hale.

My take: Been there.... Done that.... Oh, that was new.... Been there.... Done that... Get the hint? Well, that's the point of this film. Even the opening sequence rips on and deconstructs opening sequences, right before it falls into its own clichéd opening. Fans of the series will be happy to see original writer Kevin Williamson behind the pen again. This film is more reminiscent of the original Scream than the lackluster Scream 3. Throughout the story, the characters pick apart the clichés of the previous 3 films while giving away all the surprises of this one. 

The actors are plentiful in name, which helps hide the identity of the killer(s), since any one of them could be it. Each character is given enough time to give them a little depth, but not enough to be fully invested. Luckily, half the cast are return veterans, so they've been developed already. Unfortunately, the story isn't as well constructed as the cast, and the film seems to split in two, where one story follows the adults and the other follows the kids. The end results being a disjointed and muddled middle of what is, otherwise, an ok movie.

Verdict: This film feels like a warm, familiar hug...  from your uncle... that hangs on too long and begins to make you feel uncomfortable. I mean, they spend so much energy dissing the clichés they helped create, only to spend the rest of the film being mostly predictable. But, there is enough newness here to keep the fans happy.

Rating: Rent it

Genre:  Horror, Mystery, Thriller
Rating: R - for strong, bloody violence, language and some teen drinking
Run time: 103min.

Hop (Universal Pictures)

Synopsis: Hop is the story of two characters fighting to keep their dreams alive. One is the son of the Easter Bunny who's dream is to one day be a famous drummer, and the other is a human who's dream is, apparently, to not actually do anything worthwhile. They meet when, on the eve of E.B. (voiced by Russel Brand) taking over his dad's position as the Easter Bunny, E.B. runs away to Hollywood and is run over by Fred O'Hare (James Marsden). Fred reluctantly takes in E.B. and helps hide him from the Pink Berets, the Royal Guard of the Easter Bunny, sent to bring him home. Also, Fred is simultaneously trying to: find a job, hide the mess made in the house he watches for his sister's (Kaley Cuoco) boss and win his father's (Gary Cole) approval. Meanwhile, Carlos (Voiced by Hank Azaria), a power hungry chick, is sick of living in the shadow of the Easter Bunny and plots a coup to take over Easter and the candy factory on Easter Island. Hop is directed by Tim Hill (The Spongebob Squarepants Movie, Garfield: A tail of Two Kitties), and includes Elizabeth Perkins, the voice of Hugh Laurie and a cameo by David Hasselhoff.

 My take: Hello? Suspense? Where are you? This movie gives away its entire basket of goodies right up front. Plus the plot was so formulaic, I think Mad Libs needs a royalty. I mean, take the character Fred. He lost his job a year ago and is still out of work. Why? Because he found a phantom reason to dislike each decent-paying job. And, low-and-behold, his dad is disappointed in him. WOW! Who would have seen that coming? Then there's the plot to take over Easter by Carlos and his chick workforce. I'd love to meet the genius who thought "Ya know what would really draw them into the story? Let's take the most exciting part of the movie and cram it all into the last 10 minutes of the film! Don't worry, we'll sporadically elude to it earlier in the film, but we'll do it so obviously that we'll spoil the surprise, but not so much that people get drawn into that part of the storyline!" Brilliant! Either develop it further, or leave it as a surprise twist.

Then there's the lack of character depth. Fred spends the entire movie being a slacker. That's pretty much it. They don't even give him a love interest. That's the one formula, for this kind of movie, that they DIDN'T follow. They take the one hot chick and make her his sister! What the hell?  Kaley Cuoco shows excellent comic ability in The Big Bang Theory, but is left to hang out to dry here. The best they could come up with is to have her eat jellybeans crapped out by E.B. (you know, the scene in ALL the trailers). That's it? What a waste.

Speaking of waste, why hire one of the best voice actors in Hank Azaria, if all you do is marginalize his character and cram his big scene to the end where it seemingly becomes nothing more than an add-on? THAT"S where the REAL story lays. Which is more exciting: A) Will Easter be taken over and changed forever? or B) Will a bunny get to play drums and will a douchewaffle get a job? See my point? Instead, they devote more time to storyline B, perhaps so they can include a pointless cameo by the Hoff, wherein he plays himself, bleary-eyed and all, and leaves us wishing for the days he played across from a car instead of an animated rabbit.

One more thing. Why the hell did they spend the entire movie having Fred try and hide E.B. when anyone who ever interacts with him doesn't even bat an eye that he's a TALKING BUNNY? Not the waitress, not the audience of the kids play and not even the Hoff, though he may have thought it was just a drunk hallucination. Great idea, fellas. let's have a storyline and not follow it.

Verdict: Those of you with young kids will probably still take them to this movie. I wouldn't. It's a safe movie for them to see, and they'll probably love the scene where Kaley eats a jellybean, but the overall message is flawed. It's OK to let your kids dream big, but this movie says that, if you dream big enough and long enough, you can be a bum until the day you "fail-up" and your supernatural dream job falls into your lap.

Rating: Avoid it

Genre: Animation, Family, Comedy(?)
Rated: PG - for some mild, rude humor
Run Time: 90min.

Sucker Punch (IMAX)

Synopsis: An epic action fantasy in which a young girl (Emily Browning) is institutionalized by her abusive stepfather. Retreating to an alternative reality within her vivid imagination, she envisions a plan which will help her, and four other young girls, escape from the mental facility. Unrestrained by the boundaries of reality, the team of sexy warriors engage in fantastical warfare against everything from samurais to Nazi zombies (and even a dragon!). Written and directed by Zack Snyder (300), the cast of Sucker Punch includes Emily Browning, Abbie Cornish, Jena Malone, Vanessa Hudgens, Jamie Chung, Oscar Isaac and Carla Gugino.

My Take: This movie was disappointing, but enjoyable. The visual look of this film is grungy, sexist and over-the-top live-action anime. I don't know about you, but, to me, that all spells a-w-e-s-o-m-e! The storyline, however, does not.

Babydoll (Emily Browning) and her sister are to inherit a fortune after their mother's death. Their stepfather, wanting the money for himself, kills the sister and pins it on her, sending her to a mental facility. In order to deal with all this, Babydoll imagines an alternate reality, where she and the other inmates are living in a brothel. When she is forced to dance, she slips into another alternate reality where, with the help of a "wise man",  she hatches an escape plan. Babydoll's dancing is also a distraction technique used so the other girls can obtain the five items needed for the plan to work.

Now the movie takes off. While Babydoll dances, each "mission" is played out through her fantasies. Here, Snyder lays out fantastic visual action sequences. Each "mission" is an orgy of swordplay, bullets and bad-ass hand-to-hand combat set in their own distinct world, and set to songs like "White Rabbit," "Where Is My Mind" and the Beatles' "Tomorrow Never Knows". With the team dressed like the Powerpuff Girls shopped at Victoria Secret, these sequences are a teen boy's wet dream. They're music video hallucinations. Fanboy porn, as it were. This is what you'd expect from an IMAX film.


The storyline is where this film goes from Avatar to Police Academy 7: Mission to Moscow. The fantasy within a fantasy can be confusing, but this is only a problem for those that don't pay attention. The real issue is the lack of character development and weak story. The acting is decent, but the actors have nothing to work with. You can't expect the action to carry the entire film. You have to energize the in-between talky parts with a little craft and tension. I found myself unmoved by their plight and not really caring if they escaped. I was mostly just waiting for the next action sequence to begin. And, I have to ask, what women would imagine a whorehouse as an acceptable alternative to a mental facility?


Verdict: Take this movie for what it is, a visual escape from reality. If all you look for in a film is sexy girls and good CGI action, this one delivers. A better story and it could have been a summer blockbuster. The action is worthy of IMAX, but save your money. Let's hope you got a big screen tv at home.


Rating: Rent it


Genre: Action, Adventure, Sci-fi 
Rated: PG-13 – See Full Ratingfor violence, language and some sexual content 
Run Time: 110 min

Paul (Universal Pictures)

Synopsis: Simon Pegg and Nick Frost (Hot Fuzz, Shaun of the Dead) reunite as Graeme Willy (Pegg) and Clive Gollings (Frost), two sci-fi geeks on vacation to see America's UFO hot spots. Along the way, they meet Paul (Seth Rogen), a sarcastic, stoner alien on the run after escaping from a top-secret military base, and accidentally kidnap overly religious Ruth (Kristen Wiig). Chased by federal agents and the young woman's father, Graeme and Clive hatch a hap-hazard plan to return Paul to his mother ship. Paul is directed by Superbad's Greg Mottola, from a story by Pegg & Frost. Joining the comedy's cast are Jason Bateman, Bill Hader, Jane Lynch, David Koechner and Sigourney Weaver.

My take:  Don't go into this hoping for the same instant classic as Sean Of The Dead. While it's still a good movie, it just doesn't stack up. Director Greg Mottola lends a more sentimental touch to Paul. This could even be a family film, if not for the swearing and drug use. Simon and Nick's friendship really shines through as Graeme and Clive. There's no magic lost between those two. The problem is with Seth Rogan as Paul. I liked Seth in his previous films (and thought he was excellent as the Green Hornet), but this is Seth on overload, and that's just a bit too much. He wasn't all bad, but dialing him back a bit would have gone a whole lot further. Half way through, I started not really caring if Paul got away. That's not how you want the audience to feel about a main character.

Kristen Wiig was right in her wheelhouse as neurotic Ruth (reminded me of her SNL character Penelope). She plays it well as she struggles between her super-religious upbringing, and her new found freedom, complete with sexual awakenings and drug experimentation. Her scenes skip a beat when Ruth and Paul have a debate on God and evolution. That's just a little heavy of a subject for such a light-hearted film and seems a bit out of place.

Verdict: Overall, this is a nice film. It just doesn't have the comic pizazz of a film you'd expect out of a Pegg-Frost collaboration. Unfortunately, the script isn't strong enough to stand with out them. If you're a true Pegg-Frost fan, watch it with an open mind and you'll be pleasantly surprised.


My recommendation: Rent it

Genre: Comedy, Sci-fi, Adventure
Rated: R – See Full Ratingfor language including sexual references, and some drug use 
Run Time: 1 hr. 40 min.